Home >> Daily Dose >> 10 Best and Worst Cities for Middle-class Homebuyers
Print This Post Print This Post

10 Best and Worst Cities for Middle-class Homebuyers

As home prices rise across the country, which cities can a middle-class homebuyer look at to purchase their home? A study by Realtor.com looked at metros that have the highest share of homes on the market priced just right for the middle-class homebuyer to list the 10 best cities where homes for this population were affordable.

For the analysis, the team at Realtor.com identified the middle class in each of the nation’s 100 largest metros on the basis of the median household income for each area. Then they determined what these potential buyers could afford to spend on a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage with a 20 percent down payment and a 5 percent mortgage interest rate. The study assumed that those on the lower end of the income scale would pay at least 25 percent of their income, while those at the top end of the income scale would not pay more than 28 percent.

With a median household income of $72,700 and a price range of $211,700 to $553,100, Provo, Utah topped the list of best cities for middle-class homebuyers. What’s more, around 76 percent of homes in this market was for middle-class homes. Des Moines, Iowa, came in a close second on the list with a middle-class home price range of $196,100 to $512,500 and 71.8 percent of the homes on the market in that price range.

With four cities on the best list, Texas is perhaps a middle-class haven indeed. While Austin came in third in the overall rankings with a middle-class home price ranging between $216,100 and $564,800 and around 70 percent of homes in the city within this range, El Paso was fifth on the list with 69.2 percent homes affordable for the middle class, San Antonio ninth with 66 percent of homes in the city within a middle-class buyer’s price range, and Dallas rounded up the top 10 with 63 percent homes available within reach of the middle-class. Other cities to make it to the best cities list included Raleigh, North Carolina; Lakeland, Florida; and Boise, Idaho.

If the best cities had a lot of homes for the middle-class buyer, the worst ones had the least number of homes that could be afforded by the middle-class. Topping this list was Los Angeles, California with only 30.5 percent homes available within the middle-class budget and range, followed by Toledo, Ohio where only 32.3 percent homes on the market could be within the range for the middle-class homebuyer. Apart from Los Angeles, the appearance of two more California cities, San Jose and San Diego meant that the west coast was an area that most middle-class homebuyers avoided thanks to the low availability of housing within their range.

Other cities that weren’t conducive for middle-class buyers included Honolulu, Hawaii; Bridgeport, Connecticut; Syracuse and Buffalo, New York; and Dayton and Akron in Ohio.

About Author: Radhika Ojha

Radhika Ojha is an independent writer and editor. A former Online Editor and currently a reporter for MReport, she is a graduate of the University of Pune, India, where she received her B.A. in Commerce with a concentration in Accounting and Marketing and an M.A. in Mass Communication. Upon completion of her master’s degree, Ojha worked at a national English daily publication in India (The Indian Express) where she was a staff writer in the cultural and arts features section. Ojha also worked as Principal Correspondent at HT Media Ltd and at Honeywell as an executive in corporate communications. She and her husband currently reside in Houston, Texas.

Check Also

Wells Fargo Donates $40M in Efforts to Grow Diverse Housing Developers

The estimated $175 billion U.S. housing development market is known for high barriers to entry, ...

Subscribe to MDaily

MReport is here for you to stay on top of important developments in the mortgage marketplace. To begin receiving each day’s top news, market information, and breaking news updates, absolutely free of cost, simply enter your email address below.