Home >> Daily Dose >> Barney Frank States Oppositions to Senate Bill
Print This Post Print This Post

Barney Frank States Oppositions to Senate Bill

Barney FrankFormer Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts), who co-authored the 2010 law that established the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Act, also known as also known as Dodd-Frank, said Monday that he has objections to the Senate’s plan to reform.

“Substantively, I am torn between support for much of what the proposal does and opposition to two of its specific provisions,” Frank said in commentary reported by CNBC.

Frank’s first objection to the proposed amendments is the raising of the asset floor for automatic Financial Stability Oversight Council inclusion to $250 billion, calling this a “major mistake.”

“Since prudent planning must take into account the failure of more than one financial institution in a crisis situation, it is relevant to note that the collapse of three $250 billion banks puts us at the asset level of the triggering event of the 2008 crisis—Lehman Brothers,” Frank said.

As for community banks, Frank said since many of the statutory prohibitions against irresponsible loans will stay in place under the proposed bill—e.g. no negative amortizations—allowing then to make some currently restricted loans if they keep them in portfolio is socially responsible.

“But the logic of this change offers no rationale for the 1,000 percent increase in the exemption the bill gives to banks from the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act—allowing 500 mortgages a year per institution instead of 5 before this important has tool in fighting racial discrimination must be deployed,” Frank said.

What Frank suggests are further moves in to ease the way for the local banks—specifically, flexibility in the thick set of laws aimed at terrorism financing, drug smuggling, and sanctions evasion.

“There are many other provisions of the bill which I support, a few with which I disagree, and some on which I am seeking information,” Frank said. “I look forward to the debate on these ahead, but the last point I want to make here deals not with the substance of that discussion but its tone.”

By tone, Frank explained that while most of what Congress has been considering in 2017 has been about the fundamentals of public policy—whether or not we should as a society be fighting climate change or providing health care to each other or—as in the bill which passed the House-return to the days of a dangerously unregulated financial system.

In the end, the question to be answered in the debate on the legislation is whether the government can differ about the specifics of how to achieve agreed upon goals without “impugning each other's motives or grossly exaggerating differences.”

To view the full commentary, click here.

About Author: Nicole Casperson

Nicole Casperson is the Associate Editor of DS News and MReport. She graduated from Texas Tech University where she received her M.A. in Mass Communications and her B.A. in Journalism. Casperson previously worked as a graduate teaching instructor at Texas Tech's College of Media and Communications. To contact Casperson, e-mail: [email protected]

Check Also

Examining 2022 Migration Trends

More Americans moved in 2022 than in any year since 2012, according to a new study from HireAHelper, as an estimated 27.3 million people migrated throughout the U.S last year.